Oregon prides itself on not being afraid to be different. Often that’s a good thing, as when the state passed the nation’s first beverage container refund bill in 1971, or when it enacted the nation’s most comprehensive land use regulations in 1973.

Sometimes, though, it’s just a dumb thing – the prime case in point being enactment of the “kicker” law in 1980.

Xenophobia (noun) – an unreasonable fear or hatred of foreigners or strangers, or of that which is foreign or strange.

From the beginning, xenophobia has darkly stained the pages of American history. In the latter half of the 19th century, “the yellow peril” – Chinese immigrant labor – was the prime focus. During World War I, German-Americans were beaten up on the streets. During World War II we herded Japanese-Americans into concentration camps.

As anybody who’s watched recent presidential encounters knows, political debates can be a silly business. The candidates stick to the same carefully honed and well-rehearsed talking points no matter what the question is or what their opponent says.

But even at their worst, debates are worth having. They give us a look at how the candidates respond in an unscripted (or at least not totally scripted) situation. We can see how well they can think on their feet and whether they’ve taken the trouble to study up on the issues.

Which is why we’re disappointed that Greg Walden and Chris Dudley have been so bashful about debating their opponents during this campaign season.
Walden, a veteran congressman, has been challenged by Democratic opponent Joyce Seger to five debates in different areas of his vast 2nd District. Seger points out that Walden’s record on debating isn’t good: He’s either allowed no debates or has agreed to hold one only in Medford, which is at the southern end of the district and hard for many of his constituents to travel to.
We can understand why Walden feels no need to debate. He’s got one of the safest Republican districts in the country, and after 10 years in Congress he hardly needs to build name recognition. But with all the vital issues facing the country in this election year – everything from the quagmire in Afghanistan to the lingering Great Recession to the mess in the Gulf of Mexico – he owes it to voters to explain his positions in an open forum.

With Chris Dudley, the need for debates is even clearer. While Walden is a known quantity, Dudley remains a political enigma. He came out of nowhere, having never held any public office – not even so much as a school board seat. About all we’ve learned from his campaign ads so far is that he used to play in the NBA, he started a foundation to help kids with diabetes and he wants to be governor.

And, oh yeah, he wants lower taxes and create jobs.
Dudley ducked out of a debate before the Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association in the spring, claiming he had to go on a family vacation. (As it turned out, he actually went to Aspen for a Republican fundraiser and strategy session.) His Democratic rival, former Gov. John Kitzhaber, offered to debate him seven times in seven different cities across the state, but so far Dudley has agreed to only one debate, on Oct. 7 in Portland.

That’s too little – one debate isn’t enough to adequately explore all the tough issues facing Oregon. And it’s too late – only a week before ballots are mailed out.

Dudley is asking voters to give him the most important and most difficult job in state government. If he expects us to entrust him with the future of Oregon, the least he can do is face his opponent mano-á-mano. For his reluctance to do it, we’re applying El BOOT-o to Dudley’s culo – and another one to Walden’s for good measure.

Well, they went and did it again.

Two years ago, following the calamitous bust of the real estate bubble, the Bend City Council voted to give local builders and developers a break on their SDCs. SDCs – Systems Development Charges – are fees paid to help cover the cost of improvements to roads, sewer systems and other stuff made necessary by development.

Under the resolution the council passed, a builder doesn’t have to pay SDCs up front. Instead he can wait nine months or until an occupancy permit for the new structure is issued, whichever comes first. The city gets a lien on the property in case the builder doesn’t pay up. The deal essentially amounts to a nine-month, interest-free loan for the builder.

There are few symbols—save Old Glory and maybe a slice of apple pie—more symbolic of mainstream American culture than McDonald’s sweeping yellow arches.

While there is nothing wrong with McDonald’s per se — we enjoy a basket of fries and Big Mac as much as the next person, maybe more—there is a big problem with America’s dietary relationship with McDonald’s and the rest of the fast food industry that McDonald’s has rightly or wrongly come to represent. That relationship is more like dealer and junkie than that of restaurant and customer, something that Super Size Me director Morgan Spurlock noted a few years back when he reported that McDonald’s refers to its frequent customers, as “heavy users.” It’s a relationship that McDonald’s courts with its aggressive marketing toward children (McDonald’s distributes more toys than the nation’s biggest toy retailers in any given year) and its oversized portions.