They’ve taken away an on-street parking space in downtown Bend to put in a rack for 12 bicycles. The politically correct response would be to jump up and down and cheer, but pardon me if I don’t join in.
The multi-bike rack, called a “bike corral,” was installed in a parking space in front of Thump Coffee on Minnesota Avenue. It cost about $3,500, according to The Bulletin’s account, and was paid for by the Downtown Bend Business Association and individual contributors.
Kent Chapple, co-owner of Thump, said the corral was a solution to bike congestion near his shop. “It was really apparent that there just wasn’t enough capacity for all the bikes that wanted to be in this area,” he said. “If we can serve 12 people with one parking spot, that’s 11 more people down here we can serve than with that one [vehicle] parking spot.”
Thump appears to be a sort of haven for bikies. (That’s a new word I made up to identify bike enthusiasts, like “foodies” for food enthusiasts.) Chapple ride a bike to work, as do almost all of Thump’s 10 employees, according to The Bulletin.
This bike corral took away only one parking space out of about 2,000 in the downtown area. But don’t bet that it will be the last one. The Minnesota Avenue corral “could become a prototype for future bike parking structures downtown,” according to The Bulletin’s account.
Is there a legitimate need for even one on-street bike corral, let alone a bunch of them? True, many people ride bikes downtown, and more power to them. But a bike can be parked almost anywhere – chained to a tree, a signpost or a light fixture as well as a bike rack.
In 25 years of visiting Bend’s downtown I’ve never had trouble finding a parking space for a bike. Obviously I can’t say the same about a car.
The downtowners have plans to install 28 more hitching posts for bikes on the sidewalks, and I’m cool with that; it falls into the category of encouraging bicycle use. But when you take away parking spaces for cars and give them to bicycles, that’s an attempt to discourage car use – and that’s too much like trying to dictate other people’s lifestyle for me to feel comfortable with it.
It’s not hard to figure out what the bikies’ agenda is, beyond the ostensible motive of relieving alleged bicycle congestion. “We just want to promote Bend’s bike friendliness,” Chapple told The Bulletin. “We wanted to send a signal that Bend was a bike-friendly community.”
Sending such a signal is okay. But by taking away a parking space they’re also sending a signal – intentionally or not - that Bend, or at least the downtown part of it, is a car-unfriendly community.
written by Stephen Cramer , September 02, 2010
written by Jack Elliott , September 02, 2010
Well, yes and no. As in, it depends. Spare trees, signposts, and light fixtures are not always within a reasonable distance. I ride a bike downtown very frequently and while I can usually find a spot to chain up my bike, it ain't always so. In front of the Bend Brewing Company, there's only one spot unless one fancies affixing his bike to the chain link fence, blocking pedestrian traffic.
Some hot spots, like Thump, which shares bike parking with the popular Lone Pine Coffee Roasters and Top Leaf Maté are worse. Before the corral went in, there were only three or so places one could chain up a bike without interfering with traffic. Most cyclists elected to just lean their bikes against the storefronts, which is in violation of city code and caused Kent no end of headaches trying to mitigate.
He's just responding to the needs of the market. Why do you hate the free market?
I'm sure to many motorists it makes no sense to put parking for twelve in a space that a single car could park in. After all, cars are important and bikies are dirty hippies and supercilious hipsters.
But no worries -- the corral is designed to be unbolted from the ground during winter when only those bikies hardened to the core will ride a bike downtown. And motorists will be able to breath a sigh of relief to see the signs of encroaching socialism removed, if only temporarily.
written by Lauren Perry , September 02, 2010
Also, I've been downtown maybe twice, ever, when the parking garage has been completely full. If you can't walk to the elevator (or, god forbid, the stairs) from your car, maybe you should get on a bike - it sounds like you need the exercise. This isn't a way to encourage people not to drive - it's a way to encourage cyclists to continue to save energy, get some exercise, and just get outside when they head for downtown.
written by KDV , September 02, 2010
You've obviously never been much of a bike commuter. If you had, then you would realize how ridiculous your statement about how the removal of one downtown parking space sends a "car-unfriendly community" message.
Cars are such an ingrained part of our culture that everything from the way our cities are designed to pubic transportation to the way we educate the next generation of commuters (what high school kid doesn't get their driver's license?) revolves around the almighty auto. It would take something much more dramatic to send a car-unfriendly message; something along the lines of restricting cars downtown and creating a pedestrian only downtown core.
Those of us who choose bicycles as our main method of transportation can better grasp how our society and transportation are biased in favor of automobiles. Bike parking congestion downtown does exist in the warmer months, as you can only lock up 4 bikes to a hitching post. And trees and signs are not always available or good options for securing a bike.
Instead of condemning the bike corral and complaining about how the loss of one parking space downtown sends the wrong message, why not experience the influence of car culture at its finest--from the seat of a soft-bodied vehicle with two wheels and a human-powered motor? Give it a couple of months and I think you'll have a different idea about which form of transportation gets the warmer welcome in this town.
written by DC , September 02, 2010
The only agenda I see playing out with a move like this is a 6ft by 12ft (approx) glimmer of hope for a healthy future in our beautiful misguided city.
I say a big "Thank You" to the city and everyone involved in this project.
written by Lester Maddox , September 02, 2010
written by Exile , September 02, 2010
This sounds so much like the libertarian drivel coming from Vancouver, Washington, regarding Portland's bicycle efforts. Cars are not people. Yes, bicycles are coming, and cars will have to learn to safely share space. Even if it's 20 parking spaces, that's still less than .01% of total parking there. Are you really that worried that someday your car will be forever trapped in your driveway? Well, that's how it's been for cyclists for decades. I'm pretty sure, that is you drive around enough, you'll find the required space to put your two tons of steel.
written by Fun Hog , September 02, 2010
written by david baker , September 03, 2010
written by darci bright , September 03, 2010
written by ixos , September 03, 2010
To those of you who might say, "Good Riddance" to a business moving, I encourage you to realize that downtown is for everyone's use: tourists, locals, not-quite-so-locals and beyond. Sidewalks are perfectly acceptable locations for bike racks. You want to see your bike from a window? Well, I'd rather not have one of my (many) elderly customers have to carry a 30lb product two blocks to their car.
written by marjorie , September 03, 2010
Thanks and keep it coming.
written by JH. , September 03, 2010
Oh yea, Cramer...... Get real
written by Stephen Cramer , September 03, 2010
Com on, you knew what was going to happen when you blogged this. Same thing that happens when you write about the Second Amendment or the Tea Party. SOS. Different crowd. Hey, atleast critic and jegglie aren't calling you a Socialist out to take over and destroy our freedoms. I guess for that you have to move to Colorado.
written by Jack Elliott , September 03, 2010
Yeah -- so just watch your P's and Q's there, Miller. We'll support you when you're with us, but go agin us and we'll dump you faster than a politician can say "family values."
James Garfield? Darwin? Jasper Beardly? Dusty Hill?
Though I'd prefer a gay biker bar, if for no other reason than adding to local color, I say that if you muffle the f#@kers this Participatory Socialist would be fine with it.
written by Stephen Cramer , September 03, 2010
Yeah, I know, but for a second frustration coupled with an acid flashback took over and I couldn't help myself.
Just wait, someday 'we'll all be drinkin' that free Bubble Up, and eatin' that rainbow stew.'
Oops, Jack Daniels flashback.
written by tj , September 03, 2010
Last year there were at least a few spots that were motorcycle only parking. One was in front of Starbucks and another in front of Nomad and I don't recall there being an uproar about it from anyone. I'm pretty sure the one in front of Nomad is no longer motorcycle only, and I don't know about in front of Starbucks.
written by get real , September 03, 2010
How would you feel if each Harley took an entire parking spot? Or would you prefer that all 6 of them drove cars instead and took 1 spot each?
I would think that anyone concerned about limited parking would want to encourage others to ride. That's just one less person competing for a fixed number of parking spots.
Oh, and there are several hundred vacant spots in the parking garage every day. We've already proven ourselves as "car friendly" by building that multi-million dollar monstrosity.
Seriously, let's say that the biking community in bend is 1% of the population. I'd like to see 1% of the cost of the parking garage go towards bike parking.. that would be fair.
written by maggilious , September 03, 2010
written by contributor , September 03, 2010
Money raised by the community. Not tax dollars.
It unplugs from the pavement so it can be removed during winter.
written by Weekly Reader , September 04, 2010
written by Nancy P , September 04, 2010
But after being hit by bad drivers of cars not once but four times while on my bike (none of those times was I at fault), and with the BP oil spill finally bringing to light how many oil spills there actually are all of the time, and how oil has polluted this planet...you could probably say I am car-unfriendly.
written by John Personna , September 04, 2010
FWIW, I'm fine with losing one, or two, or three, parking places at the margin for bike use. As a multi-mode person, I prefer a bike-friendly downtown to the alternatives.
written by Troy , September 04, 2010
I'm not suggesting that it will always be the case that it works out that way, but if Daniel heard 4 people say that in 2 days, maybe it's not so far fetched.
written by K , September 04, 2010
written by Sam H , September 04, 2010
When you post I would consider your constituency and what is in their best interests. "Stirring the pot" is not always the best method for producing interest.
Don't you think this sound childish? "the good progressives never show up to lend a bit of support when the right-wingers are attacking me "
written by TMAN , September 06, 2010
As for them long-bed trucks. Really. As you say, one has to change lanes to avoid damaging one's car. But try riding a bike down either Bond or Wall where the parking is diagonal. I try to be a good boy and ride near the backs of the cars (keeping an eye out for the flare of backup lights) so as not to impede traffic. But when encountering one of those long trucks, one has to merge over into traffic to avoid being mashed against a tailgate.
We can all count our blessings that there are no Ford F650s downtown.
http://www.jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2006/12/f650.jpg









