bentbanner

Backcountry SkiingThanks to Seth Masia of the International Ski History Association for a heads up on a story in the Telluride (Colorado) Watch newspaper entitled “Public Lands Access For Backcountry Skiing Debated Elsewhere.”

It’s a cautionary read for skiers in parts of the backcountry ski world where getting to the best skiing often means short treks across private lands. It’s also is a read that makes you glad you live and backcountry ski in Oregon.

Here are the opening paragraphs of a long and detailed, must-read story if you’re a backcountry skier.

“In what could be called a victory for private land rights over public lands access, the U.S. Forest Service announced last week it would close backcountry access points into Upper Bear Creek at the request of private landowners whose holdings abut public land. The announcement generated a torrent of criticism from many in the Telluride community, from environmental activists to backcountry skiers who have long considered Telluride’s Bear Creek to be a local icon and public access to it sacrosanct.

While specific to Telluride and its Bear Creek backcountry, the uproar currently raging amid Telluride’s citizenry is similar to heated conversations erupting in backcountry ski havens elsewhere. Those conversations, while unique to their location and specific political climate, nonetheless relate to one common question: How public are public lands?
Parallel debates rage across the ski industry, in Utah and Wyoming. Last month a group of close to a dozen landowners whose properties are located within the Cardiff Bowl area of Big Cottonwood Canyon, near Snowbird and Alta ski resorts in Utah, sent a petition to Intermountain Forest Service Supervisor Harv Forsgren requesting the federal agency to require permits for all backcountry users of the Tri-Canyon area of Big Cottonwood Canyon, Millcreek Canyon and Little Cottonwood Canyon.”

This is an issue that could change the sport of backcountry skiing and one to keep up on for skiers who have enjoyed skiing the Utah, Colorado and Wyoming backcountry.

 

Photo by Bob Woodward.


Comments (5)add
0
...
written by flyingeagle , December 15, 2010
Complain all you want but I would not want someone walking through my yard. Put your money together and buy the access needed instead of wanting to have it for free.
0
...
written by eaglehadlanded , December 15, 2010
When your yard is 1000+ acres, and it blocks public land....who really cares if a seldom few access portion on your land monstrosity for the sake of nature. No man is an island.
0
...
written by flyingeagle , December 16, 2010
eagle . .it really comes down to not knowing who those people are. I do not like strangers around my property at all, regardless of their reasons. I am very protective of my family and I do not allow strangers around them at all. Maybe you are a trusting fellow but I am more cautious when it comes to my family.
0
...
written by Forest , December 16, 2010
I think that access trails through private property can be orchestrated if the 'owner' of the private lands would compromise some. It seems like people in general these days are selfish. The land will be there much longer then those 'owners' and it would benefit all to realize that the land is sacred and can be shared if done so with respect to those that live on it.
0
...
written by mit noslrac , December 16, 2010
Kick em out of the Wilderness also, “no mechanized equipment" most backcountry bindings have more mechanisms than one can count.
Write comment
This is a community moderated forum. For more information see our Privacy Policy.
smaller | bigger

busy

chow_sidebar

what's going on

Live Music

Events