The Bulletin, whose editorial page day by day is sounding more like The Tea Party Gazette, pitched a hissy fit this morning over what it calls a “desperate lie” against Jason Conger.
What has The Bulletin’s editorial board sputtering and fuming is a mailer recently sent to Bend voters by supporters of incumbent Judy Stiegler that claims Conger “wants to teach creationism in our public schools” and “wants to drain millions from Bend’s public schools.”
On the first charge, the editorial goes into full-on sneer mode: “What will Stiegler’s supporters claim next? That Conger wants to require public school teachers to wear crucifixes? That he forces the family dog to confess its sins once a week?”
Even more ridiculous, the editorial huffs, is the ad’s claim that Conger stated his support for creationism and school vouchers in a Bulletin story.
So what does that story – which appeared Oct. 10 under the byline of Nick Budnick – really say?
Conger “thinks Oregon should explore programs that give vouchers to parents who send their kids to private school and personally thinks that failing to teach ‘credible theories’ like ‘intelligent design,’ a theory based on biblical creationism, alongside Darwin's theory of evolution in public schools amounts to ‘censorship.’”
In other words, Conger would like to see creationism – or “intelligent design,” which is just a euphemism for it – taught in public schools. And he would like to see parents get vouchers to send their kids to private schools – vouchers paid for with tax dollars that otherwise would have gone to public education.
Where’s the “desperate lie” here?
It gets better. A paragraph from Budnick’s story that the editorial didn’t bother to quote says: “Conger said he expects to have much the same ideological profile as his ex-boss, former Congressman Frank Riggs. Riggs was a socially conservative born-again Christian.”
Riggs, a Republican who was elected to Congress from California as part of the “Gingrich Revolution” in 1994, supported a constitutional amendment to allow prayer in the schools and voted for school voucher programs. including vouchers to pay tuition at religious schools.
“Conger opposes abortion and gay marriage,” Budnick’s story continued. “He supports civil unions, though he said he doesn't have enough information to form an opinion on whether they should be granted all the same legal rights as married couples.”
Conger’s positions on abortion, creationism and school vouchers are not surprising. Early in the race this blog reported on his association with, and support by, a local group called “Prepare the Way” that appears to embrace the “Dominionist” doctrine, which holds that Christians have a divinely ordained mission to rule the Earth.
In the Budnick story, Conger goes on to say that although he’d like to see creationism made part of the curriculum and he’d like to see school vouchers, those wouldn’t be high-priority items for him if he gets into the state legislature.
The Bulletin apparently accepts those assurances at face value. Unfortunately, we all know that what politicians say to get elected and what they actually do in office aren’t always the same. And Conger wouldn’t be the first politician to hide a radical agenda behind a mild, moderate façade.
written by Ralph , October 20, 2010
written by Wayne Kinney , October 20, 2010
Second of all, The Bulletin basically stated that even if they were true, they wouldn't matter, because others (the Legislature or the courts) wouldn't allow Conger to be successful. So I guess The Bulletin doesn't care what our legislators believe, as long as we can rely on someone outside the district to stop him.
Of course, if we don't elect him, we'll stop him all by ourselves.
written by Ralph , October 20, 2010
written by aaychbee'em critic , October 20, 2010
That chip starting to get a little heavy to carry around heh there HBM?
written by aaychbee'em critic , October 21, 2010
You can disagree with me and many do, but if you want to keep a public blog, then you should expect a counter attack when you personally attack people i.e. calling them teabaggers (although you have seemed to stopped recently), Karl "Turdblossom" Rove, etc.
Nobody pays me and believe me, you don't take much of my time. You're not worth it. Needling you and your biases is payment enough.
written by Ralph , October 21, 2010
written by guttersnipe , October 21, 2010
that's your motivation for paying such close attention to a random blog that obviously makes your bile rise? you must be soooo bored. by the way, 'twas W himself who dubbed your porcine little buddy, rove, "turdblossom" quite possibly his most perceptive move ever. that's a fact look it up. i know you got time on your hands.
written by Stephen Cramer , October 22, 2010
Regular on-line readers know that critic's lack of understanding and a failure to grasp facts and issues never prevents him from attacking--even if all he can muster is an ad hominum attack. Even he has stated his online goal is tweaking HBM when he blogs. The precludes enlightenment.
Come on, everyone--lighten up.
Conger's roots should give pause--but surely someone will be able to control his baser impulses to inject those core beliefs and values into the classroom, or bedroom, or anywhere else he feels that they would best serve he and his fellow travelers. Responsibility is someone else's job, isn't it?
Come on, everyone--lighten up.
In two weeks, 'the people' will once again speak at the ballot box and we will, hopefully, survive once again. The Angles, Millers, Rands, and O'Donnells are sure to disappoint the Tea Party the way Scott Brown did. The Tea Party is nothing more than just another vessel for the rich and powerful to exert their influence and achieve their goals and the masses follow with a lack of concern or understanding. The Repubs will most likely wake up holding an unmanageable majority in the house that will only bend to its will if it assumes ever-more extreme positions that will push it out of the mainstream even further and result in a pendulum swing next election cycle. The Dems will lament the apathy that is resulting in the sea change--the resort to the obstructionist tactics practiced by the 'loyal opposition' over the last two years--then blame the Repubs for their own failures in everything that comes their way.
Come on, everyone--lighten up.
Look in the mirror and laugh.
written by Ralph , October 27, 2010
written by Ralph , October 27, 2010









