bentbanner

The Bulletin, whose editorial page day by day is sounding more like The Tea Party Gazette, pitched a hissy fit this morning over what it calls a “desperate lie” against Jason Conger.

What has The Bulletin’s editorial board sputtering and fuming is a mailer recently sent to Bend voters by supporters of incumbent Judy Stiegler that claims Conger “wants to teach creationism in our public schools” and “wants to drain millions from Bend’s public schools.”

On the first charge, the editorial goes into full-on sneer mode: “What will Stiegler’s supporters claim next? That Conger wants to require public school teachers to wear crucifixes? That he forces the family dog to confess its sins once a week?”

Even more ridiculous, the editorial huffs, is the ad’s claim that Conger stated his support for creationism and school vouchers in a Bulletin story.

So what does that story – which appeared Oct. 10 under the byline of Nick Budnick – really say?

Conger “thinks Oregon should explore programs that give vouchers to parents who send their kids to private school and personally thinks that failing to teach ‘credible theories’ like ‘intelligent design,’ a theory based on biblical creationism, alongside Darwin's theory of evolution in public schools amounts to ‘censorship.’”

In other words, Conger would like to see creationism – or “intelligent design,” which is just a euphemism for it – taught in public schools. And he would like to see parents get vouchers to send their kids to private schools – vouchers paid for with tax dollars that otherwise would have gone to public education.

Where’s the “desperate lie” here?

It gets better. A paragraph from Budnick’s story that the editorial didn’t bother to quote says: “Conger said he expects to have much the same ideological profile as his ex-boss, former Congressman Frank Riggs. Riggs was a socially conservative born-again Christian.”

Riggs, a Republican who was elected to Congress from California as part of the “Gingrich Revolution” in 1994, supported a constitutional amendment to allow prayer in the schools and voted for school voucher programs. including vouchers to pay tuition at religious schools.

“Conger opposes abortion and gay marriage,” Budnick’s story continued. “He supports civil unions, though he said he doesn't have enough information to form an opinion on whether they should be granted all the same legal rights as married couples.”

Conger’s positions on abortion, creationism and school vouchers are not surprising. Early in the race this blog reported on his association with, and support by, a local group called “Prepare the Way” that appears to embrace the “Dominionist” doctrine, which holds that Christians have a divinely ordained mission to rule the Earth.

In the Budnick story, Conger goes on to say that although he’d like to see creationism made part of the curriculum and he’d like to see school vouchers, those wouldn’t be high-priority items for him if he gets into the state legislature.

The Bulletin apparently accepts those assurances at face value. Unfortunately, we all know that what politicians say to get elected and what they actually do in office aren’t always the same. And Conger wouldn’t be the first politician to hide a radical agenda behind a mild, moderate façade. 


Comments (15)add
0
...
written by Ralph , October 20, 2010
Once again Miller shows his ignorance because of his liberal blinders. Judy Stiegler has on many occasion spoke of her ( have to us a dirty word Bruce) Christian beliefs, and I say good for her. But is it not odd that the left will go out of there way to chastise the apposing side every time referring to them as religious nut cases. Not only is your piece embarrassing to district 54 but unfounded and desperate in of its self. And you should be ashamed for writing it.I hope you find better material in the future.
H. Bruce Miller
...
written by H. Bruce Miller , October 20, 2010
Nobody called anybody a "religious nut case," Ralph.
0
...
written by Wayne Kinney , October 20, 2010
I was struck by the editorial. First of all, they weren't lies at all.
Second of all, The Bulletin basically stated that even if they were true, they wouldn't matter, because others (the Legislature or the courts) wouldn't allow Conger to be successful. So I guess The Bulletin doesn't care what our legislators believe, as long as we can rely on someone outside the district to stop him.
Of course, if we don't elect him, we'll stop him all by ourselves.
0
...
written by Ralph , October 20, 2010
Assumptions and innuendos tell a lot of a persons character and meaning but all is forgiven sir, although I don't recall saying you personally called Representative oops Mr Conger a nut case.Appreciate the banter.Have a great week.
0
...
written by aaychbee'em critic , October 20, 2010
HBM: "Yeah back in the day when I ran the Bulletin, you wouldn't read that kind of right wing BS in the editorial page. I'd lay the law down to old man Chandler and set him straight. Yup those were the days."

That chip starting to get a little heavy to carry around heh there HBM?
H. Bruce Miller
...
written by H. Bruce Miller , October 21, 2010
"Critic": I had nothing to do with the editorial page when I was managing editor of The Bulletin. Bob Chandler was in charge of that. Bob was a fiscal conservative but not a social conservative. He supported women's rights, gay rights, legalization of abortion and gun control, for example, and opposed school prayer and the teaching of creationism.

He thought Reagan was too stupid to be president; god knows what he would have thought of George W. Bush, much less Sarah Palin and the rest of the moronic Tea Party gang.

Also, unlike too many of today's conservatives, he had honor and integrity. He understood journalistic ethics and practiced them. He would never allow the news pages to be used to push an agenda, either political or financial.

I believe he would be appalled at what The Bulletin has become.

Oh -- and NOBODY "laid down the law" to Chandler. Well, except maybe his wife Nancy.

BTW, "Critic," you seem to have an awful lot of time to spend attacking me and defending The Bulletin. Is somebody paying you?
0
...
written by aaychbee'em critic , October 21, 2010
You get a public platform to espouse your thoughts/ideas most of which (but not all) attack those people, institutions, and principles that I support. I also look carefully for your consistency of thought and position as those speak to your credibility and intellectual honesty. Therefore, I will call you out each and every time I believe it is warranted....get it?

You can disagree with me and many do, but if you want to keep a public blog, then you should expect a counter attack when you personally attack people i.e. calling them teabaggers (although you have seemed to stopped recently), Karl "Turdblossom" Rove, etc.

Nobody pays me and believe me, you don't take much of my time. You're not worth it. Needling you and your biases is payment enough.
0
...
written by Ralph , October 21, 2010
Moronic tea party gang? Yep your running scared. 10 more days Brucie and you and your gang will really be name calling.I just wounder what trashy tripe you will come up with. And the cool thing is we will do it without all the what did you call it( Desperate lies and unpleasant truths)
0
...
written by guttersnipe , October 21, 2010
critic,
that's your motivation for paying such close attention to a random blog that obviously makes your bile rise? you must be soooo bored. by the way, 'twas W himself who dubbed your porcine little buddy, rove, "turdblossom" quite possibly his most perceptive move ever. that's a fact look it up. i know you got time on your hands.
0
...
written by Stephen Cramer , October 22, 2010
Come on, everyone--lighten up.

Regular on-line readers know that critic's lack of understanding and a failure to grasp facts and issues never prevents him from attacking--even if all he can muster is an ad hominum attack. Even he has stated his online goal is tweaking HBM when he blogs. The precludes enlightenment.

Come on, everyone--lighten up.

Conger's roots should give pause--but surely someone will be able to control his baser impulses to inject those core beliefs and values into the classroom, or bedroom, or anywhere else he feels that they would best serve he and his fellow travelers. Responsibility is someone else's job, isn't it?

Come on, everyone--lighten up.

In two weeks, 'the people' will once again speak at the ballot box and we will, hopefully, survive once again. The Angles, Millers, Rands, and O'Donnells are sure to disappoint the Tea Party the way Scott Brown did. The Tea Party is nothing more than just another vessel for the rich and powerful to exert their influence and achieve their goals and the masses follow with a lack of concern or understanding. The Repubs will most likely wake up holding an unmanageable majority in the house that will only bend to its will if it assumes ever-more extreme positions that will push it out of the mainstream even further and result in a pendulum swing next election cycle. The Dems will lament the apathy that is resulting in the sea change--the resort to the obstructionist tactics practiced by the 'loyal opposition' over the last two years--then blame the Repubs for their own failures in everything that comes their way.

Come on, everyone--lighten up.

Look in the mirror and laugh.

H. Bruce Miller
...
written by H. Bruce Miller , October 22, 2010
"Moronic tea party gang? Yep your [sic] running scared."

I'm not running anywhere, but you're damn right I'm scared. I'm scared of what will happen to this country if morons -- yes, that's right, morons -- like Sarah Palin, Rand Paul, Christine O'Donnell, Carl Paladino and Sharron Angle take over. You would be too if you had any sense.

"And the cool thing is we will do it without all the what did you call it( Desperate lies and unpleasant truths)"

Oh, really? Never a word about mythical "death panels," Obama's birth certificate, the government "taking over" medical care, Obama being a Muslim, Obama being a "socialist" or a "communist" -- all bare-assed lies? Yeah, tell me another one.
0
...
written by Ralph , October 27, 2010
You must be wearing stocking caps made from hemp. I cant wait until the second when I don't have to read this embarrassing rag any more as I'm the media coordinator for the local winning good guys. Do you even condescend to educate yourself of what is going on outside your tiny bubble? Wow dude your a conspiratorial freak or paranoid because your dead wrong. But what the hay its America. And I have to respect your rights.
H. Bruce Miller
...
written by H. Bruce Miller , October 27, 2010
"I cant wait until the second when I don't have to read this embarrassing rag any more"

You can stop right now, Ralph.
0
...
written by Ralph , October 27, 2010
I wish I could, but I'm a responsible adult and have to keep track of the b.s. Although I do use the physical paper to line our bird cage.But even the bird is getting tired of whiting out the typos.But its free. And the bums need blankets its damn cold out there.
H. Bruce Miller
...
written by H. Bruce Miller , October 28, 2010
"I wish I could, but I'm a responsible adult and have to keep track of the b.s."

Yeah, I feel the same about having to read the local Republican Party house organ, also known as The Bulletin.

And we don't even have a birdcage to use it in. It used to be handy for lighting the fire in the wood stove, but we don't have a wood stove anymore either.
Write comment
This is a community moderated forum. For more information see our Privacy Policy.
smaller | bigger

busy

chow_sidebar

what's going on

Live Music

Events