There is rejoicing today all over Duckdom: The University of Oregon football team is ranked Number 1 in the nation for the first time in history, and stands at Number 2 (behind Oklahoma) in the season’s first BCS standings.
Following last week’s upset of Ohio State by Wisconsin, the undefeated Ducks edged Ohio State out of the top spot in all three major polls – USA Today coaches’ poll, Harris Poll and Associated Press poll.
As followers of this blog know, I’m an ardent Duck fan and I hate to piddle on everybody’s parade … but somebody needs to say this and it might as well be me:
When Oregonians care as much about having a nationally ranked physics department or math department as they do about having a nationally ranked football team, our educational system might begin to rise above third-rate status.
Set as favorite
Share
Email this
Comments
(14)
written by jc , October 18, 2010
Yeah when Phil gives a few bucks to an academic building INSTEAD of an academic building FOR ATHLETES, I'll rejoice.
written by Brian Dunning , October 18, 2010
"We're", "We are?" How many of you source weekly athletes take the field in uniform this season? You guys are "athletic supporters" AKA Jock Straps
written by Jack Elliott , October 18, 2010
If the country cared as much about science, math, and the arts as it does about American Idol and shopping we'd have something to be proud of.
That said, go ducks!
That said, go ducks!
..., Low-rated comment [Show]
written by H. Bruce Miller , October 18, 2010
Brian: Do you put on the helmet and pads every Saturday? If not, you're just as much a "jock strap" as the rest of us.
Jack: Hey, don't diss "Idol"!
Jack: Hey, don't diss "Idol"!
written by Jack Elliott , October 18, 2010
HBM: Okay, okay, how about I use "Jersey Shore," any of the "Real Housewives of [enter region I have no intention to move to here]," or any show with "Dance" or "Dancing" in its name as examples of inanity?
written by Brian Dunning , October 18, 2010
No Bruce I do not, nor do I claim as the author who lists his education as "BLANK" claim that "WE" are number one. I don't claim the Ducks, fact is I can't stand being in Eugene on game day. I am not a jock strap athletic supporter in any stretch of your little imagination. I do however financially support some local teams, which I find far more entertaining than the UofO football inmates... I mean team.
written by Fanatic , October 18, 2010
You mean the thugs of Oregon? Not one player on the roster could make the grade to play at Stanford... or Cal or USC for that matter. Heck, if those guys couldn't tackle or throw a football, about half of them would be in jail.
My heroes.
My heroes.
written by FlyingEagle , October 19, 2010
Football has nothing to do with our education system, unless we are talking about how colleges make millions from the programs which helps the college and the education of all who attend that college, spending money on wars and short changing our children is more of a factor than football will ever be.
written by Brian Dunning , October 19, 2010
How cool is Anonymity!!! Hmm afraid to show your name AND say what you feel. You people stand up and be proud of yourselves, and your beliefs. Do not hide behind your keyboards
written by T.Collins , October 19, 2010
Who cares Oregon is still # 2 behind Oklahoma,GO Sooners!
written by Jack Elliott , October 19, 2010
T.Collins: GO Sooners?!? How dare you!
Wait, I have a longtime friend in Oklahoma City. So a Sooner victory is one for him. So that's okay.
Whew. Sports rivalry battle averted.
FlyingEagle: I get pretty much what you say, but I wonder about "[...] colleges make millions from the programs which helps the college and the education of all who attend that college."
I confess I always question these kinds of statements. Didn't we just read that UoO's athletic department was sucking money out of the general fund to pay for its programs? And saying that hosting a Superbowl is good for a city's economy, when it turns out that once you factor in the support and services the city provides, the traffic, and other negative impacts, cities actually lose money. You restaurants and hotels do pretty good, but the rest of the city ends up paying for it.
Wait, I have a longtime friend in Oklahoma City. So a Sooner victory is one for him. So that's okay.
Whew. Sports rivalry battle averted.
FlyingEagle: I get pretty much what you say, but I wonder about "[...] colleges make millions from the programs which helps the college and the education of all who attend that college."
I confess I always question these kinds of statements. Didn't we just read that UoO's athletic department was sucking money out of the general fund to pay for its programs? And saying that hosting a Superbowl is good for a city's economy, when it turns out that once you factor in the support and services the city provides, the traffic, and other negative impacts, cities actually lose money. You restaurants and hotels do pretty good, but the rest of the city ends up paying for it.
written by Jack Elliott , October 19, 2010
I need to correct my words. I wrote "And saying that hosting a Superbowl is good for a city's economy [...]" which makes it sound like I was responding to what FlyingEagle said. Better I should have written,"People also say that hosting a Superbowl is good for a city's economy...".
